I think
there is a drastic difference in the way wilderness is portrayed in the
captivity tales and “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge.” In one of them
wilderness is holding the people in a prison and will be the ultimate cause of
their destruction. On the other hand, wilderness is the freedom that will lead
one man to everything he loves.
In the
captivity narratives, wilderness is holding Rowlandson and Cabeza de Vaca back,
especially in Cabeza’s case. In Rowlandson’s case, she is more focused about
the acts of injustice that the Indians are committing to her than the harm the
wilderness is doing. In both captivity narratives, the people have to fight to
find food. When they do find food, it is often times things that today we would
never in a million years imagine eating, like raw meat. These people are
fighting with the land in order to just survive. After Cabeza de Vaca was
released from his captivity, he says “The joy we felt can only be conjectured
in terms of time, the suffering, and the peril we had endured in the land”
(34). It wasn’t that he was glad to be away from the Indians, he was glad to be
away from the land. Of course, Rowlandson would probably say differently, but
the land was just as much her enemy as the Indians were.
If you
look at “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge”, wilderness is completely
different. The wilderness is actually Farquhar’s freedom. The people are the
ones that are imprisoning him while if he just makes it to the land then he
will be free. “…the railroad ran straight away into a forest for a hundred
yards, then, curving, was lost to view” (Bierce 1). He knows that if he can
just make it into the forest, he will free and can find his family. Eventually
he does make it into the water and to the forest. He travels all the way
towards the forest where he finally reaches his house where his wife is. “He
stands at the gate of his own home. All is as he left it, and all bright and
beautiful in the morning sunshine” (Bierce 6). The wilderness is so beautiful
because he is finally home. The wilderness was his gateway to freedom.
In one
case the wilderness is a danger for its inhabitants
while on another man’s case it’s his only hope for freedom.
No comments:
Post a Comment