There were countless instances of ironies and contradictions
within this semesters reading. I think a good portion of these results in
everyone battling within themselves about ideas. We read things as the time was
changing and people had a new way of thinking. Ones writing isn’t going to be
consistent always because his/her own thinking isn’t consistent. Everyone was
trying to decide what exactly they believed in.
A big example of someone contradicting themselves is Anne
Bradstreet. You could see it when you look at her two distinctive voices that
we talked about. In certain poems, like “In Memory of My Dear Grandchild
Elizabeth Bradstreet, Who Deceased August , 1665, Being a Year and a Half Old,”
you could clearly see her Puritan beliefs and up holdings. There were other
poems, like “To My Dear and Loving Husband,” that strayed away from those
beliefs.
You could probably find ironies in all the rest of the
readings from this semester. There was also contradicting views that made it
ironic as well. Look at the two captivity narratives for example. In Rowlandson’s,
she referred to the Native people as “savages” while Cabeza de Vaca considered
them friends. Similar things happened to both of them, but they have such
contradicting views.
Benjamin Franklin’s ideas on going to Church contradict
hugely with most other people’s. He didn’t think that you had to go to Church
to be a good person and have good morals. If you didn’t go to Church, that
meant you were going to Hell, at least according to the Puritans. He believed
quite the opposite. Going to Church did not define you as a person. What you
believed and your actions did.
No comments:
Post a Comment